Perspectives Of Arab Critics On O’Neill’s Theatrical Style And Influence

Abstract

Eugene O'Neill, a prominent figure in modern drama, remains a subject of controversy among Arab and European scholars and critics due to the profound influence of his life experiences and mental conflicts on his artistic expression. His reputation as a dramatist is deeply intertwined with the divisions within his own psyche, leading to diverse interpretations of his work. This paper focuses on Arab reviewers' perspectives on O'Neill and his writing, examining critiques by Brahim Alariss, Sameer Mohammed Ismaiel, Riyadh Assmat, and Dr. Yessin Attiya. Through an analysis of their writings, this study aims to explore various aspects of O'Neill's dramatic techniques, styles, and themes as perceived by Arab critics. Brahim Alariss highlights O'Neill's success and his evolution through various dramatic styles, from realism to expressionism, while addressing pertinent aspects of his personal life. Sameer Mohammed Ismaiel discusses Hisham Kaferneh's adaptation of "Desire Under the Elms" with the Damascus National Theater Company, offering insights into its reinterpretation within the Syrian context. Dr. Yessin Attiya delves into O'Neill's characters, monologues, and stage directions, emphasizing the use of masks and character relationships. Arab reviewers provide multifaceted perspectives on Eugene O'Neill's contributions to theater, acknowledging his talent, innovation, and the profound impact of his life experiences on his art. Through their analyses, they offer valuable insights into O'Neill's diverse styles, techniques, and thematic concerns, contributing to a deeper understanding of his enduring legacy in the theatrical landscape.