Migrant Communities and Participatory Research Partnerships in the Neoliberal University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v17i2.805Keywords:
Skills shortage, brain drain, immigrant communities, Brain gain, MigrationAbstract
Participatory research holds the potential to decolonize knowledge production and put research into action to advance social justice aims and the concerns of participant communities. Participatory approaches are becoming more accepted, yet the output and impact demands researchers must fulfil remain mismatched to participatory work, driven instead by a neoliberal academic model. In this context, I see a cautionary tale in the history of participatory practices among international development institutions, where participation was brought into the mainstream but in the process hollowed out and de-radicalized. Reflecting on my experiences with two participatory research projects over the course of my PhD studies, I ask whether the incomplete opening for participatory research could similarly push research in particular directions. Specifically, I consider whether participatory work with strong organizational partners will be structurally favored over potential partnerships with non-organized or highly marginalized communities and groups.
Metrics
References
Bengle, T., & Schuch, C. (2018). Integrating participatory action research into graduate geography studies: a tale of two dissertations. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 42(4), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1514589
Caretta, M. A., & Riaño, Y. (2016). Feminist participatory methodologies in geography: creating spaces of inclusion. Qualitative Research, 16(3), 258–266. http://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116629575
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny. London and New York: Zed Books.
Cornwall, A. (2007). Buzzwords and fuzzwords: deconstructing development discourse. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 471–484. http://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469302
Cornwall, A., & Brock, K. (2005). What do buzzwords do for development policy? a critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and “poverty reduction.” Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1043–1060. http://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500235603
Darby, S. (2017). Making space for co‐produced research “impact”: learning from a participatory action research case study. Area, 49(2), 230–237. http://doi.org/10.1111/area.12321
Derickson, K., & Routledge, P. (2014). Resourcing Scholar-Activism: Collaboration, Transformation, and the Production of Knowledge. The Professional Geographer, 67(1), 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2014.883958
Evans, R. (2016). Achieving and evidencing research “impact?” Tensions and dilemmas from an ethic of care perspective. Area 48 (2):213–221. http://doi.org/10.1111/area.12256
García Zamora, R. (2005). Collective Remittances and the 3x1 Program as a Transnational Social Learning Process. Paper presented at the Mexican Migrant Social and Civic Participation in the United States seminar, Woodrow Wilson Center, Washington D.C., Nov. 4-5.
Holt, L., Jeffries, J., Hall, E., & Power, A. (2019). Geographies of co-production: Learning from inclusive research approaches at the margins. Area, 29, 5–6. http://doi.org/10.1111/area.12532
Iskander, N. 2015. Partners in Organizing: Engagement between migrants and the state in the production of Mexican hometown associations. In The State and the Grassroots, ed. A. Portes & P. Fernández-Kelly, 111–138. New York: Berghahn.
Janes, J. E. (2016). The “Will to Participate”: Governmentality, Power, and Community-Based Participatory Research. Intersectionalities 5(1), 110-125.
Kapoor, I. (2005). Participatory development, complicity and desire. Third World Quarterly, 26(8), 1203–1220. http://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500336849
Kesby, M. (2007). Spatialising participatory approaches: the contribution of geography to a mature debate. Environment and Planning A, 39(12), 2813–2831. http://doi.org/10.1068/a38326
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (Eds.) (2007). Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, participation and place. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kindon, S., & Elwood, S. (2009). Introduction: More than Methods—Reflections on Participatory Action Research in Geographic Teaching, Learning and Research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(1), 19–32. http://doi.org/10.1080/03098260802276474
Lac, V. T., & Fine, M. (2018). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: An Autoethnographic Journey on Doing Participatory Action Research as a Graduate Student. Urban Education, 53(4), 562–583. http://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918762491
Leal, P. A. (2007). Participation: the ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 539–548. http://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469518
Letiecq, B., & Schmalzbauer, L. (2012). Community-based participatory research with Mexican migrants in a new rural destination: A good fit? Action Research, 10(3), 244–259. http://doi.org /10.1177/1476750312443571
Malone, A. (2019). Collective Remittances as Mobile Policy: Institutionalization of Mexico's 3x1 Program and the evolution of diaspora development. PhD dissertation, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Manzo, L. & Brightbill, N. (2007). Toward a participatory ethics. In: S. Kindon, R. Pain & M. Kesby (eds.) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods, Abingdon: Routledge.
Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical Challenges for the “Outside” Researcher in Community-Based Participatory Research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(6), 684–697. http://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104269566
Mountz, A., Bonds, A., Mansfield, B., Loyd, J., Hyndman, J., Walton-Roberts, M., et al. (2015). For Slow Scholarship: A feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. Acme, 14(4), 1235–1259.
Pain, R. (2004). Social geography: participatory research. Progress in Human Geography, 28(5), 652–663. http://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph511pr
Pain, R. (2014). Impact: Striking a blow or walking together? Acme, 13(1), 19–23.
Portes, A., Escobar, C., & Radford, A. W. (2007). Immigrant Transnational Organizations and Development: A Comparative Study. International Migration Review, 41(1), 242–281. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2007.00063.x
Pratt, G., Philippine Women Centre of B.C., & Filipino-Canadian Youth Alliance. (2007). Working with migrant communities: Collaborating with the Kalayaan Centre in Vancouver, Canada. In: S. Kindon, R. Pain & M. Kesby (eds.) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods, Abingdon: Routledge.
Ritterbusch, A. E. (2019). Empathy at Knifepoint: The Dangers of Research and Lite Pedagogies for Social Justice Movements. Antipode, 35(4), 216–22. http://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12530
Robinson, J. A., & Hawthorne, T. L. (2018). Making Space for Community-Engaged Scholarship in Geography. The Professional Geographer, 70(2), 277–283. http://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2017.1366775
Sousa, B. J., & Clark, A. M. (2019). The Ubiquity and Invisibility of Research Failures: A Call to Share More. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–3. http://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919846977
Stoecker, R. (1999). Are academics irrelevant? Roles for scholars in participatory research. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(5), 840–854. http://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921954561
Strand, K., Marullo, S., Cutforth, N., Stoecker, R., & Donohue, P. (2003). Community-Based Research and Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Suro, R. (2005). Survey of Mexican Migrants, Part 1. Washington D.C.: Pew Hispanic Center.
Torres, R. M. (2019). Everyday Encounters with Activist Scholarship. The Professional Geographer, 71(1), 161-166. http://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2018.1453184
Wright, W. J. (2019). The Public Is Intellectual. The Professional Geographer, 71(1), 172–178. http://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2018.1453186
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
