The EU and Human Rights as Institutional Facts in the Finnish Political Discourse on Family Reunification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v16i2.744Keywords:
Temporary Protection, Syrians in Turkey, Refugee Law, Termination of Temporary Protection, Permanent SolutionAbstract
This article analyses the Finnish political response to the refugee influx connected with the Syrian war and violent conflicts in its neighbouring states. In July 2016, a law amendment on the Finnish Aliens Act about a secured income prerequisite for family reunification applications came into force. Using argumentation schemes as outlined by Fairclough & Fairclough (2012), this article analyses the discursive framing of the law amendment in Parliament. The paper benefits from the social ontology of John Searle (1995; 2010) and utilises his concept of institutional facts. The analysis shows that, as normative sources for action, the institutional context of the EU, as well as the Human Rights, possess different degrees of deontic modality which in turn shapes the representation of social reality in the context of the refugee crisis and its global and local impact.Metrics
References
Baban F., Ilcan S. & Rygiel K. (2016). Syrian refugees in Turkey: Pathways to precarity, differential inclusion, and negotiated citizenship rights. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41-57. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2016.1192996
https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1192996
Berger, J. & Strohner, L. (2017). Economic Analysis of the Refugee Influx to Austria. Border Crossing, 7(1), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v7i1.474
Carmel, E. (2014). With what implications? An assessment of EU migration governance between Union regulation and national diversity. Migration Letters, 11(2), 137-153.
https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v11i2.236
Fairclough, I. & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis. A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.
Fingerroos, O. (2016). Mitä perheenyhdistäminen tarkoittaa? In O. Fingerroos, A.-M. Tapaninen & M. Tiilikainen (Eds.), Perheenyhdistäminen. Kuka saa perheen Suomeen, kuka ei ja miksi? (pp. 65-88). Tampere: Vastapaino.
Fingerroos, O., Tapaninen, A.-M. & Tiilikainen, M. (2016). Johdanto. In O. Fingerroos, A.-M. Tapaninen & M. Tiilikainen (Eds.), Perheenyhdistäminen. Kuka saa perheen Suomeen, kuka ei ja miksi? (pp. 7-20). Tampere: Vastapaino.
Gök, F.A. & Çitci, E. G. (2017). Position of the Syrian refugee children in printed media. Border Crossing, 7(2), 231-248.
https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v7i2.463
Halme-Tuomisaari, M. (2016). Perheenyhdistäminenkö ihmisoikeus? In O. Fingerroos, A.-M. Tapaninen & M. Tiilikainen (Eds.), Perheenyhdistäminen. Kuka saa perheen Suomeen, kuka ei ja miksi? (pp. 179-194). Tampere: Vastapaino.
Holmes, S.M. & Casta-eda, H. (2016). Representing the "European refugee crisis" in Germany and beyond. Deservingness and difference, life and death. American Ethnologist, 43(1), 12–24. DOI: 10.1111/amet.12259
https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12259
Jorgensen, M. & Philips, L.J. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: SAGE.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208871
Kallius, A., Monterescu, D. & Rajaram, P.K. (2016). Immobilizing mobility: Border ethnography, illiberal democracy, and the politics of the "refugee crisis" in Hungary. American Ethnologist, 43(1), 25–37. DOI: 10.1111/amet.12260
https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12260
Kuusisto-Arponen, A.-K. (2016). Perheettömäksi suojellut: yksin tulleiden alaikäisten oikeus perheeseen. In O. Fingerroos, A.-M. Tapaninen & M. Tiilikainen (Eds.), Perheenyhdistäminen. Kuka saa perheen Suomeen, kuka ei ja miksi? (pp. 88-110). Tampere: Vastapaino.
Memisoğlu, F. & Ilgit, A. (2016). Syrian refugees in Turkey: Multifaceted challenges, diverse players and ambiguous policies, Mediterranean Politics.
DOI: 10.1080/13629395.2016.1189479
https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2016.1189479
Öner, N.A.S. & Genç, D. (2015). Vulnerability leading to mobility: Syrians' exodus from Turkey. Migration Letters, 12(3), 251-262.
https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v12i3.278
Pellander, S. (2016). Gatekeepers of the family: Regulating family migration to Finland. Academic Dissertation. Department of Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland. Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences 20 (2016), Political History. Helsinki: Unigrafia. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-1086-2
Perusel, B. (2015). Solidarity and fairness in the common European asylum system – failure or progress? Migration Letters, 12(2), 124-136.
https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v12i2.247
Rygiel, K., Baban, F., Ilcan, S. (2016). The Syrian refugee crisis: The EU-Turkey 'deal' and temporary protection. Global Social Policy, 16(3), 315-320.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018116666153
DOI: 10.1177/1468018116666153
https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018116666153
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. The Penguin Press.
Searle, J. (2010). Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? In J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics, (pp. 11-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
