Regimes of Intersection: Facing the Manifold Interplays of Discourses, Institutions, and Inequalities in the Regulation of Migration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v17i4.710Keywords:
Migration regimes, inequalities, borders, boundaries, intersectionalityAbstract
This article proposes to move towards an intersectional regime perspectives to enhance our understanding of the interrelations of borders, boundaries, and inequalities in migration contexts. It addresses a conspicuous mismatch in current research: While the contingencies and context-dependencies of migration regimes are widely acknowledged, little attention has been paid to the actual interwoven mechanisms and processes that link political orders to social formations. We suggest amending already existing analyses of intersectional effects of migration-related ‘lines of oppression’ in two regards. First, we argue for focusing on the intersectional dynamics of political rationalities that give rise to boundaries and borders (the securitisation, the economisation, and the humanitarianisation of migration). Second, we highlight the need to investigate the intersections between different fields of practice involved in the implementation and enactment of boundaries and borders. We conclude by identifying key challenges and promises of an intersectional regime perspective for migration research.
References
Amelina, A. (2017). Transnationalizing Inequalities in Europe: Sociocultural Boundaries, Assemblages, Regimes of Intersection. London: Routledge.
Amelina, A. (2020). “After the reflexive turn in migration studies: Towards the doing migration approach.” Population, Space and Place. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp. 2368.
Anthias, F. (2001). “The material and the symbolic in theorising social stratification: Issues of gender, ethnicity and class”, British Journal of Sociology 52 (3): 367–390.
Anthias, F., Kontos, M. and Morokvasic, M. (2013). Paradoxes of Integration: Female Migrants in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business.
Badenhoop, E. (2017). “Calling for the Super Citizen: Citizenship ceremonies in the UK and Germany as techniques of subject-formation”, Migration Studies, 5 (3): 409–427.
Bartels, I. (2017). “‘We must do it gently’: The contested implementation of the IOM’s migration management in Morocco”, Migration Studies, 5 (3): 315–336.
Bastia, T. (2014). “Intersectionality, migration and development”, Progress in Development Studies, 14 (3): 237–248.
Becker-Schmidt, R. (2007). “ ‘Class’, ‘gender’, ‘ethnicity’, ‘race’: Logiken der Differenzsetzung, Verschränkungen von Ungleichheitslagen und gesellschaftliche Strukturierung”. In C. Klinger, G. A. Knapp and B. Sauer (eds) Achsen der Ungleichheit: Zum Verhältnis von Klasse, Geschlecht und Ethnizität, Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Bell Hooks [i. e. Gloria Jean Watkins] (1981). Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.
Bigo, D. (2002). “Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease”, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27: S63–S92.
Boyer, R. and Saillard, Y. (eds.) (2002). Régulation Theory: The State of the Art. London: Routledge.
Brug, W. van der, D’Amato, Ruedin, D. and Berkhout, J. (eds.) (2015). The Politicisation of Migration. London: Routledge.
Casati, N. (2018). “How cities shape refugee centres: ‘Deservingness’ and ‘good aid’ in a Sicilian town”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44 (5): 792–808.
Castles, S., de Haas, H. and Miller, M.J. (2013). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World (5th ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Collins, P.H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Dahlvik, J. (2018). Inside Asylum Bureaucracy: Organizing Refugee Status Determination in Austria. Cham: Springer Open.
de Genova, N. and Peutz, N. (eds.) (2010). The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Dietze, G. (2016). “Ethnosexismus: Sex-Mob-Narrative um die Kölner Sylvesternacht”, movements, 2 (1): 177–185.
Domina, T./ Penner, A and Penner, E. (2017). Categorical Inequality: Schools As Sorting Machines. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 311-330.
El-Kayed, N. and Hamann, U. (2018). “Refugees’ access to housing and residency in German cities: Internal border regimes and their local variations”, Social Inclusion, 6 (1): 135–146.
Engbersen, G., Leerkes, A., Scholten, P. and Snel, E. (2017). “The intra-EU mobility regime: Differentiation, stratification and contradictions”, Migration Studies, 5 (3): 337–355.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Eule, T., Borrelli, L.M., Lindberg, A. and Wyss, A. (2018). Migrants Before the Law. Contested Migration Control in Europe. Berlin: Springer.
Fassin, D. (2011a). Humanitarian Reason. A Moral History of the Present. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Fassin, D. (2011b). Policing Borders, Producing Boundaries. The Governmentality of Immigration in Dark Times, Annual Review of Anthropology, 40: 213-226.
Fathi, M. (2017). Intersectionality, Class and Migration: Narratives of Iranian Women Migrants in the U.K. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2009). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2010). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gray, H.R.C. and Franck, A.K. (2018). “Refugees as/at risk: The gendered and racialised underpinnings of securitisation in British media narratives”, Security Dialogue (in press).Green, A. (1990). The Social Origins of National Education Systems. Palgrave Macmillan.
Grosfoguel, R., Oso, L. and Christou, A. (2015). “ ‘Racism’, intersectionality and migration studies: Framing some theoretical reflections. Identities, 22 (6): 635–652.
Hammar, T. (2007). “The Politicisation of Immigration”. In T. Abbas and F. Reeves (eds.) Immigration and Race Relations: Sociological Theory and John Rex. London: I.B. Tauris.
Henderson, R. (2004). Educational issues for children of itinerant seasonal farm workers: a case study in an Australian context. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(3), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360311042000257708
Hochschild, J.L. and Cropper, P. (2010). “Immigration regimes and schooling regimes: Which countries promote successful immigrant incorporation?” The School Field, 8 (1): 21–61.
Holmes, P., Fay, R. and Andrews, J. (2017). “Education and migration: Languages foregrounded”, Language and Intercultural Communication, 17 (4): 369–377.
Holmes, S.M. and Castaneda, H. (2016). “Representing the ‘European refugee crisis’ in Germany and beyond: Deservingness and difference, life and death”, American Ethnologist, 43 (1): 12–24.
Holzberg, B., Kolbe, K. and Zaborowski, R. (2018). “Figures of crisis: The delineation of (un)deserving refugees in the German media”, Sociology, 52 (3): 534–550.
Horvath, K. (2014a). Policing the Borders of the ‘Centaur State’: Deportation, Detention, and Neoliberal Transformation Processes – The Case of Austria. Social Inclusion, 2(3), 113-123.
Horvath, K. (2014b). Securitisation, economisation and the political constitution of temporary migration: The making of the Austrian seasonal workers scheme. Migration Letters, 11(2), 154-170.
Horvath, K. (2018). Fixed Narratives and Entangled Categorisations: Educational Problematizations in Times of Politicised and Stratified Migration. Social Inclusion, 6(3), 237-247.
Horvath, K. (2019). Migration Background – Statistical Classification and the Problem of Implicitly Ethnicising Categorisation in Educational Contexts. Ethnicities, 19(3), 558-574.
Horvath, K., Amelina, A., and Peters, K. (2017). Re-thinking the politics of migration. On the uses and challenges of regime perspectives for migration research. Migration Studies, 5(3), 301-314.
Huysmans, J. (2006). The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. Abingdon: Routledge.
Johnson, H.L. (2011). “Click to donate: Visual images, constructing victims and imagining the female refugee”, Third World Quarterly, 32 (6): 1015–1037.
King, D.K. (1988). “Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousnesses: The context of a black feminist ideology”, Signs, 14 (1): 42–72.
Krasner, S.D. (1982). “Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables”, International Organization, 36 (2): 185–205.
Lamont, M. and Molnár, V. (2002). “The study of boundaries in the social sciences”, Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167–195.
Lutz, H. (2017). “Care as a fictitious commodity: Reflections on the intersections of migration, gender and care regimes”, Migration Studies, 5 (3): 356–368.
Lutz, H., Herrera Vivar, M.T. and Supik, L. (2011). “Framing Intersectionality: An Introduction”. In H. Lutz, M.T. Herrera Vivar and L. Supik (eds.) Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-Faceted Concept in Gender Studies. Farnham: Ashgate.
Marshall, T.H. (1950). Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto Press.
McPherson, M. (2015). Refugee Women, Representation and Education: Creating a Discourse of Self-Authorship and Potential. Abingdon: Routledge.
Menz, G. (2009). The Political Economy of Managed Migration: Nonstate Actors, Europeanization, and the Politics of Designing Migration Policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Menz, G. and Caviedes, A. (eds.) (2010). Labour Migration in Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mezzadra, S. and Neilson, B. (2012). “Between inclusion and exclusion: On the topology of global space and borders”, Theory, Culture & Society, 29 (4/5): 58–75.
Moses, J. (2017). “Social citizenship and social rights in an age of extremes: T. H. Marshall’s social philosophy in the longue durée”, Modern Intellectual History. doi:10.1017/S1479244317000178
Neikirk, A.M. (2017). “Expectations of vulnerability in Australia”, Forced Migration Review, (54): 63–65.
Pott, A./, Rass, C. and Wolff, F. (eds.) (2018). Was ist ein Migrationsregime? What Is a Migration Regime? Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Ratfisch, P. (2015). “Zwischen nützlichen und bedrohlichen Subjekten: Figuren der Migration im europäischen ‘Migrationsmanagement’ am Beispiel des Stockholmer Programms”, movements, 1 (1).
Sainsbury, D. (2006). “Immigrants’ social rights in comparative perspective: Welfare regimes, forms in immigration and immigration policy regimes”, Journal of European Social Policy, 16 (3): 229–244.
Sales, R. (2002). “The deserving and the undeserving? Refugees, asylum seekers and welfare in Britain”, Critical Social Policy, 22 (3): 456–478.
Schwenken, H. (2018). “Intersectional migration regime analysis: Explaining gender-selective labor emigration regulations”. In A. Pott, C. Rass and F. Wolff (eds.) Was ist ein Migrationsregime? What Is a Migration Regime?. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Sciortino, G. (2004). “Between phantoms and necessary evils: Some critical points in the study of irregular migrations to Western Europe”. In A. Böcker, B. de Hart and I. Michalowski (eds.) Migration and the Regulation of Social Integration. Osnabrück: Institute for Migration Research and Intercultural Studies.
Stypińska, J. and Gordo, L.R. (2018). “Gender, age and migration: An intersectional approach to inequalities in the labour market”, European Journal of Ageing, 15 (1): 23–33.
Tilly, C. (1999). Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Walby, S. (2009). Globalisation and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. London: Sage.
Walters, W. (2006). “Border/control”, European Journal of Social Theory, 9 (2): 187–203.
Wetterich, C. (2018). Gendered Security Perspectives of the Refugee ‘Crisis’ in the British and German Media: A Securitisation of Gender? ABI Working Paper No. 9. Freiburg: Arnold Bergstraesser Institute.
Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic Boundary Making: Institutions, Power, Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
