Unraveling the Challenges in Implementing Final and Binding Decisions of Administrative Courts: A Critical Study

Authors

  • Iza Rumesten RS
  • Viorizza Suciani Putri
  • Agnes Fitryantica
  • Muhammad Bagus Adi Wicaksono
  • Abdennour Hammadi
  • Chami Yassine
  • Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar

Abstract

This academic research aims to resolve State Administrative Court (PTUN) final judgement implementation concerns. This topic was investigated using normative legal methods including statutory protection and conceptual approaches. The study demonstrates that PTUN policies that cannot be executed have made society more depressed and apathetic. PTUN judgements are difficult to implement due to a lack of an executorial body, TUN staff education, and monetary punitive procedures. The Contempt of Court arrangement must be implemented to empower the Administrative Court.CountryTo enforce Administrative Court judgements, the Administrative Court Law may be amended to make it a crime for State Administrative Officers to refuse to comply. Second, the Criminal Code (KUlHP) revision increased Contempt of Court provisions to allow court judgment waivers. Finally, with a new judicial contest legislation.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2024-01-07

How to Cite

RS, I. R. ., Putri, V. S. ., Fitryantica, A. ., Wicaksono, M. B. A. ., Hammadi, A. ., Yassine, C. ., & Muhtar, M. H. . (2024). Unraveling the Challenges in Implementing Final and Binding Decisions of Administrative Courts: A Critical Study. Migration Letters, 21(S2), 600–614. Retrieved from https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/6682

Issue

Section

Articles