The Legitimate Jurisprudential Differences Among Religious Scholars (The Concept and Reasons)

Abstract

The multiplicity of jurisprudential schools of thought, the multiplicity of points of view, and the difference of opinions on a single issue have many reasons. The researcher tried through research: (The permissible jurisprudential difference between scholars - its concept and causes); Explaining the concept and idea of the acceptable difference between scholars, and explaining the reasons in a brief manner, with a jurisprudential representation of that disagreement, without prejudice to the intended purpose.

 The study was a jurisprudential study, for the student of legal knowledge to benefit from it, and to be a contribution to the project of Muslim unity based on the rule of dialogue and good faith.

Seeking an excuse. Starting from the line of a problem that is represented in two matters: First: What is the concept of a valid jurisprudential difference between scholars? Second: What are the reasons that led to the difference between scholars? This was dealt with in two sections, each section containing three demands, and the research reached a set of results, the most prominent of which is: that the majority of the reasons for permissible jurisprudential disagreement are due to two main things: the evidence and the inferred, and that the permissible jurisprudential disagreement between scholars is the opinions and interpretations that jurists have arrived at by exerting They devoted their effort and devoted their effort to knowing the rulings on jurisprudential calamities and emerging issues, and that the causes of jurisprudential disagreement have varied into general, general causes, temporary temporary causes, and detailed partial causes, and that understanding the aspects of disagreement between scholars is based on clear foundations and clear evidence and is closer to what is right and true, as the researcher has shown that the study Reasons for disagreement gives the student a jurisprudential faculty that qualifies an idea, develops awareness, and helps him know the reasons and reasons behind the disagreement between scholars.