Jurisprudential Rules a Path to Understanding Moderation and Moderation A Rule of ''there Should be Neither Harming nor Reciprocating Harm'' as an Example

Abstract

Jurisprudential rules are a way to understand moderation and moderation - the rule of no harm and no harm as an example, to explain the importance of jurisprudential rules and their fruit, which is achieving moderation and moderation.

Explaining the jurisprudential rules established by jurists and scholars in order to achieve moderation and moderation, under the pretext of benefiting from the approaches of jurists in dealing with reality and achieving moderation in Islam. Since Islam appeared neither abstractly spiritual nor rigidly physical, but rather humanly in between, taking a share from each, as it was compatible with human nature and was not available to others, that is why it is called: the religion of natural nature.”

Moderation in all matters is one of the most important advantages of the Islamic approach. It is not an abstract meaning, but rather a behaviour, treatment, and intellectual approach that should be dealt with. Perhaps we are more in need of it today than at any other time because fanaticism and extremism have kept some people away from understanding the true meaning of Islam.

The article discussed from two problems: First: What is the relationship of jurisprudential rules to achieving moderate moderation?

 The second: What are the legal applications of the jurisprudential rules that prove moderation and centrism? The study reached results including that moderation in all matters is one of the most important advantages of the Islamic approach. It is not an abstract meaning, but rather behaviour, treatment, and an intellectual approach that should be dealt with, and that fanaticism and extremism have kept some people away from understanding the true meaning of Islam.

As the study showed through the application of what is related to imprisonment, there are two things that must be dealt with. Taking them into account in dealings is a way to understand the religion. The first: that a man should not harm his brother in the first place, and harm is that he does not harm him as a reward. The second: matching harm with harm - so what is meant by denying harm here is to deny the idea of revenge by mere revenge, the idea that increases the harm and expands its scope. Harm, even if it is for the sake of Interviewing may not be an intended goal, but rather resorted to out of necessity, in addition to moderation and moderation being free and innocent dealings without harbouring malice or evil.