Reconsidering the Importance of Social Capital for the Subjective Well-Being of Migrants in the Digital Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v16i4.550Keywords:
Climate Change Migrants, Fragile State Theory, Nationalism.Abstract
Social capital is an often-used indicator when measuring and explaining the happiness or life satisfaction levels of migrants and it is frequently measured with the item “How often do you socially meet with friends, relatives or colleagues?”. Migration studies should reconsider the weight that social capital (measured according to the frequency of socially meeting relevant others) has in the subjective well-being of migrants seen that the paradigm of the uprooted migrant has been replaced by the paradigm of the connected migrant. The purpose of this article is to show that in the digital era, the subjective well-being of the connected migrant is not influenced by physically meeting friends, relatives and colleagues as much as it was for the uprooted migrant. As supporting case study, results about the impact of social capital on the life satisfaction of East European migrants are presented.
Metrics
References
Adichie, C. N. (2013). Americanah, New York, Anchor Books, 2014.
Alencar, A. (2018). “Refugee integration and social media: a local and experiential perspective”, Information, Communication & Society, 21:11, 1588-1603,DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1340500
Arpino, B. & de Valk, H. (2017). “Comparing Life Satisfaction of Immigrants and Natives Across Europe: The Role of Social Contact”. Social Indicators Research. Springer.
Brinkerhoff, J. (2009). Digital diasporas: Identity and transnational engagement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Bjørnskov, C. (2008). “Social capital and happiness in the United States”. Applied Research Quality Life, 3(1), 43–62
Bjørnskov, C. (2003). “The happy few: Cross-country evidence on social capital and life satisfaction”. Kyklos, 56(1), 3–16.
Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age. Economy, Society and Culture, Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell Publishing, Second Edition.
Codagnone, C., & Kluzer, S. (2011). ICT for the social and economic integration of migrants into Europe. European Commission. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Available at: http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC63183.pdf
Coleman, J. (1988). “Social capital in the creation of human capital”. American Journal of Sociology. 94, pp. 95-120
Christensen, M., & Jansson, A. (2015). “Complicit surveillance, interveillance, and the question of cosmopolitanism”. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1473–1491.
Dalen, H.; Henkens, K. (2009). Invisible barriers in international labour migration: the case of the Netherlands. Discussion paper. Available at: http://www.nidi.nl/shared/content/output/2009/center-discussion-2009-16.pdf
Diminescu, D. (2008). “The connected migrant: an epistemological manifesto”. Social Science Information. Vol 47. No 4. SAGE Publications
Faist, T. (2009). Migrația transnațională ca imobilitate relativă intr-o lume globalizată. In Anghel, R. G. & Horvath, I. (eds.) Sociologia Migrației, teorii și studii de caz românești. Polirom
Granovetter, M. (1983). “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited”, Sociological Theory, Vol. 1.
Heath, A. F., Rothon, C., & Kilpi, E. (2008). “The second generation in Western Europe: Education, unemployment and occupational attainment”. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, pp. 211–235.
Inglehart, R.; Welzel, C. (2015). The world values survey cultural map of the world. World values surveys project. Retrieved from http://www. worldvaluessurvey. org/WVSContents.Jsp
Leurs, K.; Ponzanesi, S. (2018). “Connected migrants: Encapsulation and cosmopolitanization”, Popular Communication, 16:1, 4-20, DOI: 10.1080/15405702.2017.1418359
Leurs, K.; Smets, K. (2018). “Five Questions for Digital Migration Studies: Learning From Digital Connectivity and Forced Migration In(to) Europe”. Social Media + Society, January-March 2018: 1 –16. Sage.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051187644
Lin, N.; Cook, K.; Burt, R. (Editors), (2001). Social Capital. Theory and Research, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Narayan, D. (2001). “A Dimensional Approach to Measuring Social Capital: Development and Validation of a Social Capital Inventory”, Current Sociology, 49.
Popa, D.M. (2018). “Life Satisfaction of East European migrants in three clustered European destinations”. On-line Journal Modelling the New Europe. Issue no. 26/2018, pp. 191-216.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work – civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton university Press.
Rodrıguez-Pose, A.; von Berlepsch, V. (2014). “Social Capital and Individual Happiness in Europe”. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15. Pp. 357–386. DOI 10.1007/s10902-013-9426-y
Sandu, D. (2010). Lumile sociale ale migrației românești în străinătate, Editura Polirom.
Sayad, A. (1999). La double absence. Des illusions de l’émigré aux souffrances de l’immigré, Paris: Seuil.
Veenhoven, R. (1991). “Is happiness relative?”. Social Indicators Research, Volume 24, pp. 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292648.
Voicu, B. (2013). Capital social in Romania inceputului de Mileniu: Drumet in tara celor fara de prieteni? Editura Lumen.
Woolcock. M. (1998). “Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework”. Theory and Society. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006884930135
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
