Universalist Rights and Particularist Duties: The Case of Refugees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v16i2.541Abstract
The conflict between refugees’ human right to be admitted to a safe country and the right of states to exercise sovereign control of their borders, including the right to deny refugees entry, can be understood in terms of a normative conflict between two ethical systems, namely those of ethical universalism and ethical particularism. Here it is suggested that this conflict can be resolved by combining a universalist comparable cost argument with a particularist fair share argument. The comparable cost argument affirms that a state receiving refugees should allow at least the most basic rights of refugees to override less important rights of its own citizens. The fair share argument modifies the comparable cost argument by affirming that no state is morally obligated to sacrifice any of its citizens’ rights for the sake of protecting a larger share of refugees than what is fair, given its resources.
Metrics
References
Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. London: Allen Lane.
Carens, J. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gewirth, A. (1978). Reason and Morality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gewirth, A. (1982). Human Rights. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Griffin, J. (2008). On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238781.001.0001
Gutmann, A. (2001). "Introduction". In: A. Gutmann (ed.), Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (pp. vii–xxviii). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
IMF. (2018). World Economic Outlook Database, April 2018. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/01/weodata/index.aspx
Kelly, E. (2003). "The Burdens of Collective Liability". In: D. K. Chatterjee and D. E. Schied (eds.), Ethics and Foreign Intervention (pp. 118–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, E. (2004). "Human Rights as Foreign Policy Imperatives". In: D. K. Chatterjee (ed.), The Ethics of Assistance (pp. 177–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817663.010
Kennan, G. F. (1985). "Morality and Foreign Policy". Foreign Affairs, 64 (2): 205–218.
https://doi.org/10.2307/20042569
Miller, D. (2016). Strangers in Our Midst. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674969827
Murphy, L. (1993). "The Demands of Beneficence". Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22 (4): 267–292.
Nagel, T. (2005). "The Problem of Global Justice". Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33 (2): 113–147.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00027.x
Pogge, T. (2005). "Real World Justice". The Journal of Ethics, 9 (1–2): 29–53
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3313-z
Sen, A. (2010). The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books.
Singer, P. (2016). One World Now. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sirkeci, I. (2017). "Turkey's Refugees, Syrians, and Refugees from Turkey: A Country of Insecurity". Migration Letters, 14 (1): 127–144.
https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v14i1.321
Stilz, A. (2009). Liberal Loyalty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830701
UNHCR. (2018). Figures at a Glance. Retrieved September 25, 2018, from http://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html
Walzer, M. (2000). Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books.
Wellman, C. H. & Cole, P. (2011). Debating the Ethics of Immigration. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
