Conceptualization and Moral Diaxioma in the Transversality of Bioethical Approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS2.3733Abstract
Currently there are various perspectives and understandings on ethics such as metaethics, normative ethics, ethics of minimums, maximalist ethics, and applied ethics where various authors contextualize bioethics from its founding stage with Fritz Jahr in 1927 and Van Rensselaer Potter in 1970 applying them to the proper conduct in relation to man and other living beings along with their concern for their own survival (Sass, 2007; Beauchamp & Childress, 2001; Nuno-Martins, 2018; McPherson, 2022). Complementarily, they have arisen with the passage of time, scientific research and its circumstances both favorable and adverse, varied bioethical approaches, such as bioethics in principled perspective focused on research praxis, or that which assumes the on-personalist approach guided by the integral valuation of human dimensions, also speaks of a bioethics of virtue that assumes the Aristotelian-Thomistic theses regarding the good performance of the human that for that matter would be the professional of health and life sciences; or from inter and transdisciplinary approaches of an ecological bioethics and even a global bioethics, all these approaches being the ones that have caused the most impact generating abundant scientific literature in various languages.
Metrics
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0