Exploring The Linkages Between Coaching Styles (Democratic & Autocratic) And Players’ Perceived Satisfaction

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between coaching styles, democratic and autocratic and players' perceived satisfaction within context of team sports. Coaching style is a critical factor influencing athletes' psychological well-being, motivation, and performance. Using quantitative approach, data were collected from 322 students in higher education institutions, Punjab, Pakistan over structured survey. The findings reveal that democratic coaching, characterized by participatory decision-making and mutual respect, significantly enhances players' satisfaction. Conversely, autocratic coaching, marked by strict authority and unilateral decision-making, was found to have the mixed impact, with some players appreciating its structure while others reported decreased satisfaction due to limited autonomy. The study highlights the standing of tailoring coaching styles to players’ preferences and situational demands to exploit their satisfaction. Practical implications suggest that coaches should adopt a flexible approach, combining elements of democratic and autocratic styles to foster supportive yet disciplined environment. These findings contribute to the growing body of research on sports psychology and coaching efficacy.