A Critical Analysis Of Pakistan’s Strategic Decision To Support The Us War On Terror

Abstract

The primary goal of this research is to understand Pakistan's decision to support the US war on terror and its implications for Pakistan. The decision by the Pakistani organization to truly maintain the US in its contention on fear after the 9/11 attacks has had long stretch results. The repercussions are agonizingly clear now that the US mediation in Afghanistan is quickly moving towards its decision. At the time the decision was made, the normal environment guided the public power of Pakistan to act quickly for the USA. [1]It would have been disastrous to challenge the United States. Pakistan lacks the resources and tools necessary to define an independent path. In this quality of overwhelming impulse and fear, the super prudent choice was hard and fast and finished cooperation. This paper argues that when a single person is in charge, the decision-making process can be stymied, which can have unfavorable effects in the long run.