Ethical Dilemmas In Media Coverage Of Israel - Palestine Conflict: Analysis Of The New York Times

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess news articles on the Israel-Palestine conflict and to evaluate the reporting pattern of The New York Times about this conflict. Out of 38 news articles, 23 are classified as highly negative, while 10 are classified as moderately negative, suggesting a significant focus on unfavorable viewpoints. By comparison, a mere 7 pieces were classified as fairly favorable, while 9 were classified as highly positive. These findings give rise to ethical concerns regarding the newspaper’s dedication to journalistic integrity, impartia[1]lity, and equity. The New York Times’ content may breach the ideals of accurate, fair, and unbiased reporting, which are essential in journalistic ethics. The study aims to draw attention towards the fact that the ethical reporting pattern of The New York Times has not changed with the passage of time; rather it remains the same - that is biased and non-acceptance of the diverse views as underscored by systematic review. This research provides readers with insight into the New York Times’ long-standing method of story presentation because it shows that the newspaper’s reporting pattern has stayed constant over time.